Evaluation of recent Earth’s global gravity field models with terrestrial gravity data

  • Alexander P. KARPIK Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • Vadim F. KANUSHIN Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • Irina G. GANAGINA Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • Denis N. GOLDOBIN Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • Nikolay S. KOSAREV Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • Alexandra M. KOSAREVA Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technology, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Keywords: Earth’s gravity field, differences, gravity anomalies, global geopotential model, terrestrial gravity data

Abstract

In the context of the rapid development of environmental research technologies and techniques to solve scientific and practical problems in different fields of knowledge including geosciences, the study of Earth’s gravity field models is still important today. The results of gravity anomaly modelling calculated by the current geopotential models data were compared with the independent terrestrial gravity data for the two territories located in West Siberia and Kazakhstan. Statistical characteristics of comparison results for the models under study were obtained. The results of investigations show that about 70% of the differences between the gravity anomaly values calculated by recent global geopotential models and those observed at the points in flat areas are within ±10 mGal, in mountainous areas are within ±20 mGal.

Published
2016-03-31
How to Cite
KARPIK, A. P., KANUSHIN, V. F., GANAGINA, I. G., GOLDOBIN, D. N., KOSAREV, N. S., & KOSAREVA, A. M. (2016). Evaluation of recent Earth’s global gravity field models with terrestrial gravity data. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 46(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1515/congeo-2016-0001
Section
original research papers